Brain connectivity changes to fast versus slow dopamine increases.

The rewarding effects of stimulant drugs such as methylphenidate (MP) depend crucially on how fast they raise dopamine in the brain. Yet how the rate of drug-induced dopamine increases impacts brain network communication remains unresolved. We manipulated route of MP administration to generate fast versus slow dopamine increases. We hypothesized that fast versus slow dopamine increases would result in a differential pattern of global brain connectivity (GBC) in association with regional levels of dopamine D1 receptors, which are critical for drug reward. Twenty healthy adults received MP intravenously (0.5 mg/kg; fast dopamine increases) and orally (60 mg; slow dopamine increases) during simultaneous [11C]raclopride PET-fMRI scans (double-blind, placebo-controlled). We tested how GBC was temporally associated with slow and fast dopamine increases on a minute-to-minute basis. Connectivity patterns were strikingly different for slow versus fast dopamine increases, and whole-brain spatial patterns were negatively correlated with one another (rho = -0.54, pspin < 0.001). GBC showed "fast>slow" associations in dorsal prefrontal cortex, insula, posterior thalamus and brainstem, caudate and precuneus; and "slow>fast" associations in ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and frontopolar cortex (pFDR < 0.05). "Fast>slow" GBC patterns showed significant spatial correspondence with D1 receptor availability (estimated via normative maps of [11C]SCH23390 binding; rho = 0.22, pspin < 0.05). Further, hippocampal GBC to fast dopamine increases was significantly negatively correlated with self-reported 'high' ratings to intravenous MP across individuals (r(19) = -0.68, pbonferroni = 0.015). Different routes of MP administration produce divergent patterns of brain connectivity. Fast dopamine increases are uniquely associated with connectivity patterns that have relevance for the subjective experience of drug reward.

Development of a novel rodent rapid serial visual presentation task reveals dissociable effects of stimulant versus nonstimulant treatments on attentional processes.

The rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task and continuous performance tasks (CPT) are used to assess attentional impairments in patients with psychiatric and neurological conditions. This study developed a novel touchscreen task for rats based on the structure of a human RSVP task and used pharmacological manipulations to investigate their effects on different performance measures. Normal animals were trained to respond to a target image and withhold responding to distractor images presented within a continuous sequence. In a second version of the task, a false-alarm image was included, so performance could be assessed relative to two types of nontarget distractors. The effects of acute administration of stimulant and nonstimulant treatments for ADHD (amphetamine and atomoxetine) were tested in both tasks. Methylphenidate, ketamine, and nicotine were tested in the first task only. Amphetamine made animals more impulsive and decreased overall accuracy but increased accuracy when the target was presented early in the image sequence. Atomoxetine improved accuracy overall with a specific reduction in false-alarm responses and a shift in the attentional curve reflecting improved accuracy for targets later in the image sequence. However, atomoxetine also slowed responding and increased omissions. Ketamine, nicotine, and methylphenidate had no specific effects at the doses tested. These results suggest that stimulant versus nonstimulant treatments have different effects on attention and impulsive behaviour in this rat version of an RSVP task. These results also suggest that RSVP-like tasks have the potential to be used to study attention in rodents.

Delayed-onset posttraumatic stress disorder with response to methylphenidate / Trastorno por estrés postraumático de expresión retardada con respuesta a metilfenidato

Introduction: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is extremely frequent in war veterans and has been widely studied. However, the efficacy of currently available pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments of war PTSD and other causes of PTSD is very limited. Method We present a case of war PTSD with delayed expression, with a good response to complementation with methylphenidate after a failed treatment with venlafaxine and risperidone. Results We review the role of dopamine in the pathophysiology of PTSD and the scarce studies in the treatment of PTSD with dopaminergic drugs that show an improvement in re-experimentation and in affective symptoms, especially anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Conclusions We conclude that the use of methylphenidate and other dopaminergic drugs can be a promising treatment for PTSD, a high prevalent disease with a high resistance to treatment, for which we encourage the use of large sample studies. (AU)

Introducción: El trastorno por estrés postraumático (TEPT) es extremadamente prevalente en veteranos de guerra y ha sido ampliamente estudiado. Sin embargo, la eficacia de los tratamientos farmacológicos y psicoterapéuticos disponibles es aún muy limitada, tanto en el TEPT de guerra como en el TEPT por otras causas. Método Presentamos un caso de TEPT de guerra con expresión retardada, con una buena respuesta al metilfenidato a su tratamiento con venlafaxina y risperidona, que había resultado ineficaz. Resultados Revisamos el rol de la dopamina en la psicopatología del TEPT y los pocos estudios del tratamiento del TEPT con fármacos dopaminérgicos, en los que se muestra una mejoría en los síntomas de reexperimentación y los síntomas afectivos, especialmente la anhedonia y los déficits cognitivos secundarios. Conclusiones Consideramos que el uso del metilfenidato y de otros fármacos dopaminérgicos podrían ser prometedores el tratamiento del TEPT, un trastorno altamente prevalente y con alta resistencia al tratamiento habitual. Por esto, animamos a realizar estudios con muestras amplias. (AU)

Estimulantes de tipo anfetamínico en estudiantes de medicina latinoamericanos: una revisión / Amphetamine-type stimulants in Latin American medicine students: a review

Introducción: el consumo de estimulantes de tipo anfetamínico (ETA) y sus derivados está cada vez más presente en los estudiantes universitarios y, en particular, en los programas de medicina. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue revisar la literatura sobre el uso de ETA y sus derivados en estudiantes de medicina latinoamericanos. Materiales y método: se realizó una revisión de la literatura disponible, utilizando las bases de datos PubMed, SciELO y LILACS. Se encontraron un total de 1.054 artículos, de los cuales 17 fueron seleccionados para esta revisión. Resultados: la revisión muestra, en general, una mayor frecuencia de uso de ETA en estudiantes de medicina de América Latina en comparación con la población general y estudiantes de otras carreras universitarias. También existe una tendencia a un mayor uso en hombres, de mayor nivel socioeconómico y en cursos posteriores del programa. La razón más informada para usar ETA fue aumentar el rendimiento académico. Como factor protector se destacaron los deportes, el tiempo en familia y la profesión de alguna creencia religiosa. De los artículos seleccionados, no se encontraron estudios sobre las consecuencias a largo plazo del uso de ETA en estudiantes de medicina. Discusión: en resumen, los estudiantes de medicina latinoamericanos tienen un alto consumo de ETA, por lo que es evidente la necesidad de nuevos estudios para mejorar la precisión estadística, determinar factores de riesgo específicos, estudiar las consecuencias a largo plazo y establecer políticas de prevención y tratamiento.

Introduction: the consumption of amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) and their derivatives are increasingly present in university students and in particular in medical programs. The main objective of this study was to review the literature on the use of ATS and their derivatives in Latin American medical students. Materials and method: a review of the literature available was performed, using PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS databases. A total of 1054 articles were found, of which 17 were selected for this review. Results: the review generally shows a higher frequency of use of ATS in medical students of Latin America compared to the general population and students from other university degrees. There is also a tendency of a higher use in men, from higher socioeconomic status, and in later courses of the program. The most reported reason for using ATS was to increase the academic performance. As a protective factor, sports, family time and professing some religious belief stood out. Of the selected articles, no studies were found on the long-term consequences of the use of ATS in medical students. Discussion: in summary, Latin American medical students have a high consumption of ATS, and therefore there is an evident need for new studies to improve statistical precision, to determine specific risk factors, to study long-term consequences, and to stablish prevention policies and treatment.

Methylphenidate and Other Pharmacologic Treatments for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.

Apathy is a common and important yet often ignored neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, used to treat AD, appear ineffective against apathy. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) found that psychostimulants significantly attenuated apathy ratings in AD. However, the pooled sample size in this meta-analysis was just 156, and one of the trials was a 2-week crossover study with a large effect. A large RCT (n = 200) has now been published. This study found that methylphenidate (MPH; 20 mg/d) was superior to placebo in the attenuation of apathy scores in patients with possible or probable, mild to moderate AD; the advantage was evident by the end of the second month of treatment and remained evident to the end of 6 months. The effect size at 6 months was small (Cohen d = 0.37). In this RCT, disappointingly, MPH was not superior to placebo on secondary outcomes, including informant-rated apathy, dependence, activities of daily living, quality of life, and neurocognitive performance; caregiver burden was not formally studied. Speculatively, the psychosocial intervention provided to all participants in this RCT may have boosted response in the placebo group, thereby attenuating differences in outcomes between the MPH and placebo groups. A reasonable conclusion is that whereas MPH may attenuate the severity of apathy in patients with AD across as long as 6 months, the absence of improvements in measures of dependence, activities of daily living, and quality of life suggest that this effect of MPH on apathy may not be clinically significant. An unanswered question is whether the benefits of MPH may be clinically significant in real world practice settings in which the delivery of behavioral interventions is not feasible.

Chronic treatment and abstinence from methylphenidate exposure dose-dependently changes glucose metabolism in the rat brain.

Methylphenidate (MP) is extensively prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). While MP is effective in ameliorating symptoms of ADHD, MP is also used illicitly among healthy subjects without ADHD for cognitive-enhancing purposes. The deleterious consequences associated with long-term MP use as well as its cessation on brain activity remains to be understood. To address this, we administered either water, low dose MP (LD MP), or high dose MP (HD MP) to healthy adolescent Sprague Dawley rats, with five days on the treatment and two days off for thirteen consecutive weeks. Rats were then abstinent from their respective treatments for four weeks. Using positron emission tomography (PET) and fluorodeoxyglucose [18F] (FDG), we scanned rats at three time points: after thirteen weeks of treatment, after one week of abstinence, and after four weeks of abstinence. After thirteen weeks of LD and HD MP treatment, increases in brain glucose metabolism (BGluM) were seen in several cortical and subcortical regions associated with sensory and motor functions as well as learning and memory. One-week abstinence from LD MP treatment promoted increased BGluM compared to both water treated and HP MP treated groups. After four weeks of abstinence, little group differences were seen. Longitudinally, we observed contrasting differences on BGluM depending on whether a LD or HD of MP was administered. Our results demonstrate that MP treatment during adolescence can significantly alter BGluM. Moreover, these changes in brain activity do not subside in many areas of the brain after both one and four-week drug abstinence.

Internet parent-child interaction therapy (I-PCIT) in medically ill child: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case illustrates the feasibility, benefit, and putative enhanced ecological validity of performing internet-parent-child interaction therapy (I-PCIT) in the parent-child dyad's home for the treatment of behavior problems in medically ill children in the context of a global pandemic. PATIENT CONCERNS: Parents of a 5-year-old girl initially presented with concerns regarding inattentiveness, physical and verbal fighting with her siblings, and getting kicked out of daycare for hitting another child. Patient also had difficulties sleeping at night. DIAGNOSES: Patient was diagnosed with electrical status epilepticus in sleep, frontal lobe executive function deficit, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. INTERVENTIONS: Patient received a course of I-PCIT. Equipment included a cell phone with video capabilities connected to a videotelephony software program and set-up in the child's home by the parents. The treatment course included 8, 1-hour, weekly teaching/coaching sessions (7 of which were performed using I-PCIT) plus 1 follow-up booster session 6 months later. OUTCOMES: Home-based I-PCIT implementation greatly improved disruptive behaviors in a young child with electrical status epilepticus in sleep and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. CONCLUSION: A combination of I-PCIT and methylphenidate allowed her to be successful at home and in a school setting. More research is needed on PCIT adaptations, such as home-based and internet-based PCIT, for medically ill children as well as treatment protocols for combined therapies.

Dopaminergic and noradrenergic modulation of stress-induced alterations in brain activation associated with goal-directed behaviour.

BACKGROUND: Acute stress is thought to reduce goal-directed behaviour, an effect purportedly associated with stress-induced release of catecholamines. In contrast, experimentally increased systemic catecholamine levels have been shown to increase goal-directed behaviour. Whether experimentally increased catecholamine function can modulate stress-induced reductions in goal-directed behaviour and its neural substrates, is currently unknown. AIM: To assess whether and how experimentally induced increases in dopamine and noradrenaline contribute to the acute stress effects on goal-directed behaviour and associated brain activation. METHODS: One hundred participants underwent a stress induction protocol (Maastricht acute stress test; MAST) or a control procedure and received methylphenidate (MPH) (40 mg, oral) or placebo according to a 2 × 2 between-subjects design. In a well-established instrumental learning paradigm, participants learnt stimulus-response-outcome associations, after which rewards were selectively devalued. Participants' brain activation and associated goal-directed behaviour were assessed in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner at peak cortisol/MPH concentrations. RESULTS: The MAST and MPH increased physiological measures of stress (salivary cortisol and blood pressure), but only MAST increased subjective measures of stress. MPH modulated stress effects on activation of brain areas associated with goal-directed behaviour, including insula, putamen, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, frontal pole and orbitofrontal cortex. However, MPH did not modulate the tendency of stress to induce a reduction in goal-directed behaviour. CONCLUSION: Our neuroimaging data suggest that MPH-induced increases in dopamine and noradrenaline reverse stress-induced changes in key brain regions associated with goal-directed behaviour, while behavioural effects were absent. These effects may be relevant for preventing stress-induced maladaptive behaviour like in addiction or binge eating disorder.

Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are distinctly associated with rest-activity rhythms and drug reward.

BACKGROUNDCertain components of rest-activity rhythms such as greater eveningness (delayed phase), physical inactivity (blunted amplitude), and shift work (irregularity) are associated with increased risk for drug use. Dopaminergic (DA) signaling has been hypothesized to mediate the associations, though clinical evidence is lacking.METHODSWe examined associations between rhythm components and striatal D1 (D1R) and D2/3 receptor (D2/3R) availability in 32 healthy adults (12 female, 20 male; age 42.40 ± 12.22 years) and its relationship to drug reward. Rest-activity rhythms were assessed by 1-week actigraphy combined with self-reports. [11C]NNC112 and [11C]raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans were conducted to measure D1R and D2/3R availability, respectively. Additionally, self-reported drug-rewarding effects of 60 mg oral methylphenidate were assessed.RESULTSWe found that delayed rhythm was associated with higher D1R availability in caudate, which was not attributable to sleep loss or so-called social jet lag, whereas physical inactivity was associated with higher D2/3R availability in nucleus accumbens (NAc). Delayed rest-activity rhythm, higher caudate D1R, and NAc D2/3R availability were associated with greater sensitivity to the rewarding effects of methylphenidate.CONCLUSIONThese findings reveal specific components of rest-activity rhythms associated with striatal D1R, D2/3R availability, and drug-rewarding effects. Personalized interventions that target rest-activity rhythms may help prevent and treat substance use disorders.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03190954.FUNDINGNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550).

MicroPET/CT assessment of neurochemical effects in the brain after long-term methylphenidate treatment in nonhuman primates.

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a psychostimulant approved by the FDA to treatment Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). MPH is believed to exert its pharmacological effects via preferential blockade of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the norepinephrine transporter (NET), resulting in increased monoamine levels in the synapse. We used a quantitative non-invasive PET imaging technique to study the effects of long-term methylphenidate use on the central nervous system (CNS). We conducted microPET/CT scans on young adult male rhesus monkeys to monitor changes in the dopaminergic system. We used [18F] AV-133, a ligand for the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), and [18F]FESP a ligand for the D2 and 5HT2 receptors. In this study we evaluated the effects if chronic MPH treatment in the nonhuman primates (NHP). Two-year-old, male rhesus monkeys were orally administered MPH diluted in the electrolyte replenisher, Prang, twice a day, five days per week (M-F) over an 8-year period. The dose of MPH was gradually escalated from 0.15 mg/kg initially to 2.5 mg/kg/dose for the low dose group, and 1.5 mg/kg to 12.5 mg/kg/dose for the high dose group (Rodriguez et al., 2010). Scans were performed on Mondays, about 60 h after their last treatment, to avoid the acute effects of MPH. Tracers were injected intravenously ten minutes before microPET/CT scanning. Sessions lasted about 120 min. The Logan reference tissue model was used to determine the Binding Potential (BP) of each tracer in the striatum with the cerebellar cortex time activity curve as an input function. Both MP treatment groups had a lower [18F] AV-133 BP, although this failed to reach statistical significance. MPH treatment did not have a significant effect on The BP of [18F] FESP in the striatum. Long-term administration of MPH did not significant change any of the marker of monoamine function used here. These data suggest that, despite lingering concerns, long-term use of methylphenidate does not negatively impact monoamine function. This study also demonstrates that microPET imaging can distinguish differences in binding potentials of a variety of radiotracers in the CNS of NHPs. This approach may provide minimally-invasive biomarkers of neurochemical processes associated with chronic exposure to CNS medications. (Supported by NCTR).

Fluoxetine Potentiates Oral Methylphenidate-Induced Gene Regulation in the Rat Striatum.

Methylphenidate (MP) is combined with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine (FLX) to treat various disorders. MP, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, helps manage attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is abused as a cognitive enhancer; it has a reduced addiction liability. We showed that combining FLX (serotonin) with MP potentiates MP-induced gene regulation in the striatum. These studies used intraperitoneal drug administration, which is relevant for MP abuse. Clinically, MP and FLX are taken orally (slower bioavailability). Here, we investigated whether chronic oral administration of MP and FLX also altered striatal gene regulation. MP (30/60 mg/kg/day), FLX (20 mg/kg/day), and MP + FLX were administered in rats' drinking water for 8 h/day over 4 weeks. We assessed the expression of dynorphin and substance P (both markers for striatal direct pathway neurons) and enkephalin (indirect pathway) by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Chronic oral MP alone produced a tendency for increased dynorphin and substance P expression and no changes in enkephalin expression. Oral FLX alone did not increase gene expression. In contrast, when given together, FLX greatly enhanced MP-induced expression of dynorphin and substance P and to a lesser degree enkephalin. Thus, FLX potentiated oral MP-induced gene regulation predominantly in direct pathway neurons, mimicking cocaine effects. The three functional domains of the striatum were differentially affected. MP + SSRI concomitant therapies are indicated in ADHD/depression comorbidity and co-exposure occurs with MP misuse as a cognitive enhancer by patients on SSRIs. Our findings indicate that MP + SSRI combinations, even given orally, may enhance addiction-related gene regulation.

Treatment with Methylphenidate for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the Risk of All-Cause Poisoning in Children and Adolescents: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at higher risk of all-cause poisoning by drugs and chemicals (intentional or accidental). Currently, there is limited data on whether medication treatment for ADHD can reduce the risk of all-cause poisoning. METHODS: Patients aged 5-18 years with a methylphenidate (MPH) prescription and an incident poisoning diagnosis between January 2001 and June 2020 were identified from the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. A self-controlled case series study design was used to compare the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of all-cause poisoning during different risk windows (30 days before the first MPH prescription, exposure periods within 30 days of the first prescription, and periods of subsequent exposure) compared with the reference window (other non-exposure periods). RESULTS: 42,203 patients were prescribed ADHD medication in Hong Kong during the study period. Of these, 417 patients who had both an MPH prescription and poisoning incident recorded were included in the main analysis. Compared with other non-exposed periods, a higher risk of poisoning was found in the 30 days before the first prescription (IRR 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-5.22) and exposure periods within 30 days of the first prescription (IRR 2.18, 95% CI 1.06-4.48), but not during prolonged exposure. However, compared with 30 days before the first prescription as well as exposure periods within 30 days of the first prescription, there was a lower risk during the subsequent exposure (IRRs 0.49 and 0.60, respectively). Similar results to the main analysis were also found in the subgroup analysis of intentional poisoning and females, but not in that of accidental poisoning and males. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of all-cause poisoning was higher shortly before and after the first MPH prescription and became lower during the subsequent prescription period. Our results do not support an association between the use of MPH and an increased risk of all-cause poisoning in children and adolescents and, in fact, suggest that longer-term use of MPH may be associated with a lower risk of all-cause poisoning, although this latter finding requires further study.

Symptomatic and Functional Response and Remission From the Open-Label Treatment-Optimization Phase of a Study With DR/ER-MPH in Children With ADHD.

Objective: Delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH), the first stimulant predicted to be absorbed primarily in the colon, demonstrated significant improvements in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and functional impairment from awakening until evening versus placebo in clinical trials. The clinical significance of these improvements was explored post hoc by examining response and remission thresholds as well as safety in the context of dose optimization.Methods: Data from the open-label, treatment-optimization phase of a phase 3 study of DR/ER-MPH in children (aged 6-12 years) with ADHD, as diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria and enrolled between July 2015 and March 2016, were analyzed. Thresholds for response (anchored to Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale [CGI-I] score of 1 or 2) and remission were applied to ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Before School Functioning Questionnaire (BSFQ), and Parent Rating of Evening and Morning Behavior, Revised, Morning Subscale (PREMB-R AM) and Evening Subscale (PREMB-R PM) scores. Rates of response, remission, and treatment-emergent adverse events by starting dose were examined.Results: Mean DR/ER-MPH dose increased from 29.7 mg/d at baseline (51% on 20 mg/d; 49% on 40 mg/d) to 66.2 mg/d at week 6. At week 6, most participants achieved response/remission thresholds (response/remission: ADHD-RS-IV: 97%/89%; BSFQ: 98%/94%; PREMB-R AM: 94%/98%; PREMB-R PM: 91%/84%). More participants starting on a 40-mg versus 20-mg dose achieved thresholds at week 1 (P < .02). Weekly treatment-emergent adverse event rates over the open-label period were similar between starting doses.Conclusions: When DR/ER-MPH dosing was optimized for ADHD symptom control throughout the day, the majority of participants achieved thresholds indicating all-day control of ADHD symptoms and functional impairment to the level of their non-ADHD peers.Trial Registration: Data used in this post hoc analysis came from the study with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02493777.

Effect of a Multi-Layer, Extended-Release Methylphenidate Formulation (PRC-063) on Sleep in Adults with ADHD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Forced-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Trial Followed by a 6-month Open-Label Extension.

BACKGROUND: The effects of stimulant treatment on sleep in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are complex and varied, with some individuals experiencing worsening of sleep but others experiencing improvement. METHODS: Data from previously reported trials of the clinical efficacy and safety of the long-acting methylphenidate formulation PRC-063 (Adhansia XR® in the USA; Foquest® in Canada) in adults with ADHD were used to evaluate patient-reported sleep outcomes, as captured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and adverse events of insomnia. The trials comprised 4 weeks of randomized, forced-dose PRC-063 treatment at a dose of 0 (placebo), 25, 45, 70, or 100 mg/day followed by an optional 6 months of open-label PRC-063 treatment at an individually optimized dose of 25-100 mg/day. RESULTS: At the end of double-blind treatment, PRC-063 (all doses combined; N = 297) showed no significant difference versus placebo (N = 78) in least squares mean change in global PSQI score from baseline (- 0.7 vs. - 1.3; P = 0.0972) or in scores for each of the seven subscales of the PSQI. For patients enrolled in the open-label extension (N = 184), mean ± standard deviation global PSQI score improved from 7.8 ± 3.55 at the end of double-blind treatment to 5.8 ± 3.11 at 1 month and 5.4 ± 3.21 at 6 months (P < 0.0001). A greater proportion of patients were good sleepers (global PSQI score ≤ 5) at the end of the open-label extension (57.3%) than at baseline (20.9%) or at the end of double-blind treatment (26.0%). In a logistic regression analysis, baseline global PSQI score (odds ratio 1.491; P < 0.0001), but not randomized study treatment (P = 0.1428), was a significant predictor of poor sleep (global PSQI score > 5) at the end of double-blind treatment. Adverse event rates for insomnia (15.8 vs. 3.8%) and initial insomnia (6.1 vs. 1.3%) during double-blind treatment were higher for PRC-063 (all doses combined) than for placebo. Two patients receiving PRC-063 in the double-blind study and one patient in the open-label study were withdrawn because of insomnia adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, on average, PRC-063 had no significant impact on overall sleep quality in adults with ADHD. Although insomnia was observed as an adverse event, when sleep was measured over time as an outcome in its own right for patients receiving dose-optimized PRC-063 open-label, more patients showed improvement in sleep than deterioration. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFER: NCT02139124 and NCT02168127.

The Use of Methylphenidate for Cognitive Enhancement in Young Healthy Adults: The Clinical and Ethical Debates.

OBJECTIVE: Methylphenidate (MP), a drug of choice for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is a federally restricted substance CII in the United States because of abuse and dependence, and similar restrictions are practiced in Canada and around the world. This designation is given to drugs with medical value that present a high potential for abuse. In view of these severe restrictions, it is concerning to find out that a large group of healthy young adults, at least as large as the ADHD group of patients, take MP for cognitive enhancement, in an attempt to improve their academic achievements during studies and examinations. These young adults buy MP illegally and consume it without any medical supervision. The objective of the present debate piece is to present the ethical and clinical issues that need to be addressed in an attempt to solve this dilemma. METHODS: The issues presented here are systematically reviewed and discussed along the following lines: MP effectiveness in enhancing cognitive achievements in healthy people; "As these are normal healthy people, what is the duty of physicians to 'treat' them?"; potential benefits of cognitive enhancement to healthy people; the risks of MP; "How do these young people get their MP?"; and "What can be done?" RESULTS: Methylphenidate is widely used for cognitive enhancement without medical supervision. The effectiveness of MP for cognitive enhancement is well documented along a dose-response curve. Congruent with the results of the randomized trials, repeated studies based on interviews suggest that numerous young people report that cognitive enhancement helps them in improving their academic achievements, and hence also improve their feeling of well-being. Presently, most regulatory and medical organizations limit the use of MP to ADHD and narcolepsy. Yet, the American Academy of Neurology ruled that there is a moral, ethical, and legal basis to prescribe the drug for cognitive enhancement. The drug has known dose-dependent adverse effects that can have serious ramifications and may often lead to poor adherence. The relative risk of MP causing sudden death/arrhythmia is 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.07), and there are estimated 20 million college and university students in the United States in 2020. The rate of sudden death/arrhythmias in this age group ranges between 1 and 10 per 100,000. This translates to an excess of 146 deaths caused by MP every year in the United States considering postsecondary students only. DISCUSSION: We propose that an ethical-clinical debate should be followed by an action plan to ensure that the present reality of millions of young people taking unsupervised MP is not accepted as a force majeure that cannot be changed.

Perception-Action Integration Is Modulated by the Catecholaminergic System Depending on Learning Experience.

BACKGROUND: The process underlying the integration of perception and action is a focal topic in neuroscientific research and cognitive frameworks such as the theory of event coding have been developed to explain the mechanisms of perception-action integration. The neurobiological underpinnings are poorly understood. While it has been suggested that the catecholaminergic system may play a role, there are opposing predictions regarding the effects of catecholamines on perception-action integration. METHODS: Methylphenidate (MPH) is a compound commonly used to modulate the catecholaminergic system. In a double-blind, randomized crossover study design, we examined the effect of MPH (0.25 mg/kg) on perception-action integration using an established "event file coding" paradigm in a group of n = 45 healthy young adults. RESULTS: The data reveal that, compared with the placebo, MPH attenuates binding effects based on the established associations between stimuli and responses, provided participants are already familiar with the task. However, without prior task experience, MPH did not modulate performance compared with the placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Catecholamines and learning experience interactively modulate perception-action integration, especially when perception-action associations have to be reconfigured. The data suggest there is a gain control-based mechanism underlying the interactive effects of learning/task experience and catecholaminergic activity during perception-action integration.

Fetal methylphenidate exposure induced ADHD-like phenotypes and decreased Drd2 and Slc6a3 expression levels in mouse offspring.

Methylphenidate (MPD) is used as a first-line treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The number of prescriptions for ADHD patients is increasing, suggesting that the number of fertile women using such medication might be also increasing. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of MPD exposure during the fetal period on infant development, behavior, learning, and memory in mice. Expression levels of candidate genes associated with ADHD were also determined in the brain of pups born to MDP-treated dams who were administered MPD orally at a dose of 2.5, 7.5, or 15 mg/kg daily from gestational day 1 to the day before delivery. Offspring aged 6-8 weeks were subjected to the spontaneous locomotor activity, elevated plus-maze, and passive avoidance tests and therapeutic treatments with MPD or atomoxetine. Fetal MPD exposure induced ADHD-like phenotypes, such as hyperactivity and impulsivity, in mouse offspring, which were suppressed by treatment with MPD and atomoxetine. These mice showed decreased Drd2 and Slc6a3 expression levels in the brain, which are often observed in ADHD model animals. Our results suggest that continuous use of MPD during pregnancy induces ADHD phenotypes in the offspring.

How Frequent Is Switching From an Initial Stimulant Family to the Alternative One in the Clinical Setting?: A Pilot Study of 49 Consecutively Referred Medication-Naive Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of needing to switch the initial treatment of a stimulant to the alternative family in newly referred, medication-naive adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) initiating treatment with stimulants. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Subjects were 49 unmedicated adults (18-45 years old) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders (Fifth Edition) ADHD who initiated treatment with a stimulant. Before the clinical assessment with an expert clinician, participants completed the Adult Self-Report, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version, Emotional Dysregulation Subscale of the Barkley Current Behavior Scale-Self-report, and Mind Wandering Questionnaire. The rate of switching was examined using information from the electronic medical record for up to three clinical follow-up visits. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not need to switch on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of ADHD patients were initially prescribed a methylphenidate product, and 33%, an amphetamine product. Forty-one percent of ADHD patients needed to switch from their initially prescribed stimulant family within 90 days of initiating treatment because of poor tolerability. Whereas the rate of switching was significantly higher in those initially prescribed methylphenidate, the rate of patients who required changes in formulation (long- to short-acting and vice versa) or additional antianxiety or antidepressant treatment ("strugglers") was higher in those taking amphetamine. Switchers were more impaired on the Adult Self-Report Intrusive scale, whereas nonswitchers were more impaired on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Inhibit and Task Monitor scales. However, these findings were small and of unclear clinical significance. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Forty-one percent of medication-naive adults with ADHD initiating stimulant treatment required a switch from the initially prescribed stimulant family to the alternative one because of poor tolerability. Switching could not be adequately predicted by baseline demographic or clinical characteristics. These findings call for improved efforts to help identify predictors of response to stimulant treatment in adults with ADHD to avoid unnecessary delays in identifying a safe and effective treatment for these patients.

Immediate-release methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by symptoms of inattention or impulsivity or both, and hyperactivity, which affect children, adolescents, and adults. In some countries, methylphenidate is the first option to treat adults with moderate or severe ADHD. However, evidence on the efficacy and adverse events of immediate-release (IR) methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD in adults is limited and controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and harms (adverse events) of IR methylphenidate for treating ADHD in adults. SEARCH METHODS: In January 2020, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, eight additional databases and three trial registers. We also searched internal reports on the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration websites. We checked citations of included trials to identify additional trials not captured by the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IR methylphenidate, at any dose, with placebo or other pharmacological interventions (including extended-release formulations of methylphenidate) for ADHD in adults. Primary outcomes comprised changes in the symptoms of ADHD (efficacy) and harms. Secondary outcomes included changes in the clinical impression of severity and improvement, level of functioning, depression, anxiety and quality of life. Outcomes could have been rated by investigators or participants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently on the characteristics of the trials, participants, interventions; outcomes and financial conflict of interests. We resolved disagreements by discussion or consulting a third review author. We obtained additional, unpublished information from the authors of one included trial that had reported efficacy data in a graph. We calculated mean differences (MDs) or standardized MDs (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data reported on the same or different scales, respectively. We summarized dichotomous variables as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials published between 2001 and 2016 involving 497 adults with ADHD. Three trials were conducted in Europe and one in Argentina; the remaining trials did not report their location. The RCTs compared IR methylphenidate with placebo, an osmotic-release oral system (OROS) of methylphenidate (an extended-release formulation), an extended-release formulation of bupropion, lithium, and Pycnogenol® (maritime pine bark extract). Participants comprised outpatients, inpatients in addiction treatment, and adults willing to attend an intensive outpatient program for cocaine dependence. The duration of the follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 weeks. IR methylphenidate versus placebo We found very low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may reduce symptoms of ADHD when measured with investigator-rated scales (MD -20.70, 95% CI -23.97 to -17.43; 1 trial, 146 participants; end scores; Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale (AISRS), scored from 0 to 54), but the evidence is uncertain. The effect of IR methylphenidate on ADHD symptoms when measured with participant-rated scales was moderate, but the certainty of the evidence is very low (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.25 to 0.06; I2 = 69%; 2 trials, 138 participants; end scores). There is very low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may reduce the clinical impression of the severity of ADHD symptoms (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.28; 2 trials, 139 participants; I2 = 0%; change and end scores; Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity scale (scored from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse))). There is low-certainty evidence that, compared with placebo, IR methylphenidate may slightly impact the clinical impression of an improvement in symptoms of ADHD (MD -0.94, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.51; 1 trial, 49 participants; end scores; CGI-Improvement scale (scored from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse))). There is no clear evidence of an effect on anxiety (MD -0.20, 95% CI -4.84 to 4.44; 1 trial, 19 participants; change scores; Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A; scored from 0 to 56); very low-certainty evidence) or depression (MD 2.80, 95% CI -0.09 to 5.69; 1 trial, 19 participants; change scores; Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D; scored from 0 to 52); very low-certainty evidence) in analyses comparing IR methylphenidate with placebo. IR methylphenidate versus lithium Compared with lithium, it is uncertain whether IR methylphenidate increases or decreases symptoms of ADHD (MD 0.60, 95% CI -3.11 to 4.31; 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (scored from 0 to 198); very low-certainty evidence); anxiety (MD -0.80, 95% CI -4.49 to 2.89; 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; HAM-A; very low-certainty evidence); or depression (MD -1.20, 95% CI -3.81 to 1.41, 1 trial, 46 participants; end scores; HAM-D scale; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included trials assessed participant-rated changes in symptoms of ADHD, or clinical impression of severity or improvement in participants treated with IR methylphenidate compared with lithium. Adverse events were poorly assessed and reported. We rated all trials at high risk of bias due to selective outcome reporting of harms and masking of outcome assessors (failure to blind outcome assessor to measure adverse events). Overall, four trials with 203 participants who received IR methylphenidate and 141 participants who received placebo described the occurrence of harms. The use of IR methylphenidate in these trials increased the risk of gastrointestinal complications (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.95) and loss of appetite (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.96). Cardiovascular adverse events were reported inconsistently, preventing a comprehensive analysis. One trial comparing IR methylphenidate to lithium reported five and nine adverse events, respectively. We considered four trials to have notable concerns of vested interests influencing the evidence, and authors from two trials omitted information related to the sources of funding and conflicts of interest. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no certain evidence that IR methylphenidate compared with placebo or lithium can reduce symptoms of ADHD in adults (low- and very low-certainty evidence). Adults treated with IR methylphenidate are at increased risk of gastrointestinal and metabolic-related harms compared with placebo. Clinicians should consider whether it is appropriate to prescribe IR methylphenidate, given its limited efficacy and increased risk of harms. Future RCTs should explore the long-term efficacy and risks of IR methylphenidate, and the influence of conflicts of interest on reported effects.